Re: [PATCH] perf: CXL: fix mismatched number of counters mask

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:28:54 +0100
Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 09:33:09PM +0900, Jeongtae Park wrote:
> > The number of Count Units field is described as 6 bits long
> > in the CXL 3.0 specification. However, its mask value was
> > only declared as 5 bits long.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> > index 0a8f597e695b..365d964b0f6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> >  #include "../cxl/pmu.h"
> >  
> >  #define CXL_PMU_CAP_REG			0x0
> > -#define   CXL_PMU_CAP_NUM_COUNTERS_MSK			GENMASK_ULL(4, 0)
> > +#define   CXL_PMU_CAP_NUM_COUNTERS_MSK			GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> >  #define   CXL_PMU_CAP_COUNTER_WIDTH_MSK			GENMASK_ULL(15, 8)
> >  #define   CXL_PMU_CAP_NUM_EVN_CAP_REG_SUP_MSK		GENMASK_ULL(24, 20)
> >  #define   CXL_PMU_CAP_FILTERS_SUP_MSK			GENMASK_ULL(39, 32)  
> 
> I don't have access to the CXL spec, but widening this mask looks like
> it puts us out-of-whack with CXL_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS.
> 
> Did v3.0 of the spec bump the number of counters? If so, can you please
> check that this is a backwards-compatible change?

CXL Performance monitors were only introduced in CXL 3.0 so not that.

The max value that register can take is 0x3f (0 based, so 64 counters ==
CXL_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS)
So it should be 6 bits wide. I did some history digging and this isn't
even a draft spec / final spec issue - simple typo I guess.

Fix seems correct to me.

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>



> 
> Will