Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: introduce stromer plus ops

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Thu Sep 07 2023 - 11:35:51 EST


On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 08:22, Varadarajan Narayanan
<quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Stromer plus APSS PLL does not support dynamic frequency scaling.
> To switch between frequencies, we have to shut down the PLL,
> configure the L and ALPHA values and turn on again. So introduce the
> separate set of ops for Stromer Plus PLL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> index e4ef645..2ef81f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> @@ -2479,3 +2479,71 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_stromer_ops = {
> .set_rate = clk_alpha_pll_stromer_set_rate,
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_stromer_ops);
> +
> +static int clk_alpha_pll_stromer_plus_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> + u32 l, alpha_width = pll_alpha_width(pll);
> + u64 a;
> +
> + req->rate = alpha_pll_round_rate(req->rate, req->best_parent_rate, &l,
> + &a, alpha_width);
> + return 0;
> +}

What is the plL_alpha_width on stromer_plus? Does
clk_alpha_pll_stromer_determine_rate() work for you?

> +
> +static int clk_alpha_pll_stromer_plus_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long prate)
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> + u32 l, alpha_width = pll_alpha_width(pll);
> + int ret;
> + u64 a;
> +
> + rate = alpha_pll_round_rate(rate, prate, &l, &a, alpha_width);
> +
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), 0);
> +
> + /* Delay of 2 output clock ticks required until output is disabled */
> + udelay(1);
> +
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l);
> +
> + if (alpha_width > ALPHA_BITWIDTH)
> + a <<= alpha_width - ALPHA_BITWIDTH;
> +
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), a);
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(pll),
> + a >> ALPHA_BITWIDTH);
> +
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_BYPASSNL);
> +
> + /* Wait five micro seconds or more */
> + udelay(5);
> + regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_RESET_N,
> + PLL_RESET_N);
> +
> + /* The lock time should be less than 50 micro seconds worst case */
> + udelay(50);
> +
> + ret = wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("alpha pll running in 800 MHz with source GPLL0\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_OUTCTRL,
> + PLL_OUTCTRL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_stromer_plus_ops = {
> + .enable = clk_alpha_pll_enable,
> + .disable = clk_alpha_pll_disable,
> + .is_enabled = clk_alpha_pll_is_enabled,
> + .recalc_rate = clk_alpha_pll_recalc_rate,
> + .determine_rate = clk_alpha_pll_stromer_plus_determine_rate,
> + .set_rate = clk_alpha_pll_stromer_plus_set_rate,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_stromer_plus_ops);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h
> index e4bd863..903fbab 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_ops;
> extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_huayra_ops;
> extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_ro_ops;
> extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_stromer_ops;
> +extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_stromer_plus_ops;
>
> extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_fabia_ops;
> extern const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_fixed_fabia_ops;
> --
> 2.7.4
>


--
With best wishes
Dmitry