Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/alternatives: Simplify ALTERNATIVE_n()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Sep 07 2023 - 11:38:56 EST


On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 01:11:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 01:09:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Anyway, the 1,3,2 variant spelled out reads like:
> >
> > #APP
> > # 1563 "../arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c" 1
> > # ALT: oldnstr
> > 661:
> > # ALT: oldnstr
> > 661:
> > push %rbp
> > 662:
> > # ALT: padding
> > .skip -(((665f-664f)-(662b-661b)) > 0) * ((665f-664f)-(662b-661b)),0x90
> >
> > # Which evaluates like:
> > # 665f-664f = 3
> > # 662b-661b = 1
> > # 3-1 > 0 = -1
> > # --1 * (3-1) = 2
> > #
> > # so two single byte nops get emitted here.
> >
> > 663:
> > .pushsection .altinstructions,"a"
> > .long 661b - .
> > .long 664f - .
> > .4byte ( 3*32+21)
> > .byte 663b-661b
> > .byte 665f-664f
> > .popsection
> > .pushsection .altinstr_replacement, "ax"
> > # ALT: replacement
> > 664:
> > mov %rsp,%rbp
> > 665:
> > .popsection
> >
> > 662:
> > # ALT: padding
> > .skip -(((665f-664f)-(662b-661b)) > 0) * ((665f-664f)-(662b-661b)),0x90
> >
> > # And this evaluates to:
> > # 665f-664f = 2
> > # 662b-661b = 3 (because it includes the original 1 byte instruction and 2 bytes padding)
> > # 3-1 > 0 = 0
> > # 0 * (3-1) = 0
>
> copy-paste fail, that needs to read:
>
> 3-3 > 0 = 0
> 0 * (3-3) = 0

I'm a moron ofcourse:

2-3

>
> > #
> > # so no extra padding
> >
> > 663:
> > .pushsection .altinstructions,"a"
> > .long 661b - .
> > .long 664f - .
> > .4byte ( 3*32+21)
> > .byte 663b-661b
> > .byte 665f-664f
> > .popsection
> > .pushsection .altinstr_replacement, "ax"
> > # ALT: replacement
> > 664:
> > push %r12
> > 665:
> > .popsection
> >
> > # 0 "" 2
> > # ../arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:1569: int3_selftest();
> > #NO_APP