Re: [PATCH 22/52] m68k: atari: Add and use "atari.h"

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Sep 08 2023 - 03:13:36 EST


Hi Finn,

On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 3:05 AM Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2023, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > atariints.h already has some prototypes, so yes on that account.
> >
> > atarihw.h only has inlines, but sound and time related prototypes could
> > be added there, too.
> >
> > Geert's intentions might have been avoiding inclusion of all the
> > hardware specific data in those two files, but the only source file to
> > benefit from this is config.c (the other three already include
> > atariints.h and atarihw.h).
> >
> > OTOH, considering this patch series adds a lot of other headers that
> > only contain prototypes, it might be better to keep to that pattern
> > everywhere.
>
> I think Geert's intention may have been to avoid adding definitions to the
> asm/foo.h headers shipped with "make headers_install". If that's the
> intention, there would seem to be a mess to be cleaned up, for which I'm
> partly to blame...

arch/m68k/include/asm/ is not shipped, (arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/ is).
However, arch/m68k/include/asm/ is shared with the whole tree, while
only the core code under arch/m68k/ needs these definitions.

There is (are) definitely (an) opportunit{y,ies} for moving more stuff
around (from <asm/...> to "...", more extern declarations in C files, ...).
Not to mention the more substantial rework...
But Linux/m68k^WRome wasn't built in a decade neither... ;-)

And TBH, I also went for the "minimum amount of work" ;-)
(which didn't work out that well, yet another rabbit hole, as usual...).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds