Re: [PATCH 4/4] sh: machvec: remove custom ioport_{un,}map()

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Adrian,

On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 12:11 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-08-02 at 20:48 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > These functions were only used on the microdev
> > board that is now gone, so remove them to simplify
> > the ioport handling.
> >
> > This could be further simplified to use the generic
> > I/O port accessors now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

> >  void ioport_unmap(void __iomem *addr)
> >  {
> > -     if (sh_mv.mv_ioport_unmap)
> > -             sh_mv.mv_ioport_unmap(addr);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ioport_unmap);
>
> Why aren't you removing the function ioport_unmap(void __iomem *addr) completely
> and just turn it into stub? Is it still referenced somewhere?

Because architectures are supposed to implement it (there is no
__weak default).

An alternative would be to provide a dummy static inline, like
e.g. m68k does:

arch/m68k/include/asm/kmap.h:#define ioport_unmap ioport_unmap
arch/m68k/include/asm/kmap.h:static inline void ioport_unmap(void __iomem *p)
arch/m68k/include/asm/kmap.h-{
arch/m68k/include/asm/kmap.h-}

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds