Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: add mt8395-evk board

[Macpaul Lin]

On 9/11/23 14:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 	
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you 
> have verified the sender or the content.
>
> On 10/09/2023 14:23, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > On 9/10/23 18:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > External email : Please do nost click links or open attachments until you 
> > > have verified the sender or the content.
> > >
> > > On 09/09/2023 15:28, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > > > 1. Add compatible for MT8395.
> > > > 2. Add bindings for the MediaTek mt8395-evk board, also known
> > > > as the "Genio 1200-EVK".
> > > >
> > > > The MT8195 and MT8395 belong to the same SoC family,
> > > > with only minor differences in their physical characteristics.
> > > > They utilize unique efuse values for differentiation.
> > > >
> > > > The booting process and configurations are managed by boot
> > > > loaders, firmware, and TF-A. Consequently, the part numbers
> > > > and procurement channels vary.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Changes for v4:
> > Changes for v5:
> >   - No change, update Reviewed-by tag only. Thanks.
> >
> > The explanation is here. The version v4 and v5 are the same.
> > For sending v5 is because "Patch v5 2/2" has been updated and these 2 
> > patches were in the same patch set. I think to update the whole patch 
> > set together with a single modified patch should be a usual operation.
> > Did I miss anything?
>
> Yeah, like not top-posting.
>
> Why do you change the same line in other patchset?

Hmm, they are different patch actually.
I've tested the patch v5 here can be applied with / without mt8365's 
description patch independently.
I'm not sure why the patch show the patch started from the same line number.
@@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ properties:
But these 2 patch sets seems won't be conflict at my local.

> > > Confusing. You just sent a patch changing the same hunk - adding
> > > description, without any explanation.
> >
> > The marketing naming rule of MediaTek SOCs are usually confusing people. 
> > I guess the previous patch just confused you. Ha.
>
> ?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thanks
Macpaul Lin