Re: [PATCH V2] SELinux: Check correct permissions for FS_IOC32_*

From: Stephen Smalley
Date: Mon Sep 11 2023 - 18:21:59 EST


On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:54 PM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Alfred,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on 50a510a78287c15cee644f345ef8bac8977986a7]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alfred-Piccioni/SELinux-Check-correct-permissions-for-FS_IOC32_/20230906-200131
> base: 50a510a78287c15cee644f345ef8bac8977986a7
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906115928.3749928-1-alpic%40google.com
> patch subject: [PATCH V2] SELinux: Check correct permissions for FS_IOC32_*
> config: i386-debian-10.3 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230909/202309090600.NSyo7d2q-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230909/202309090600.NSyo7d2q-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309090600.NSyo7d2q-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_file_ioctl':
> >> security/selinux/hooks.c:3647:9: error: duplicate case value
> 3647 | case FS_IOC32_GETFLAGS:
> | ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3645:9: note: previously used here
> 3645 | case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS:
> | ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3648:9: error: duplicate case value
> 3648 | case FS_IOC32_GETVERSION:
> | ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3646:9: note: previously used here
> 3646 | case FS_IOC_GETVERSION:
> | ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3654:9: error: duplicate case value
> 3654 | case FS_IOC32_SETFLAGS:
> | ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3652:9: note: previously used here
> 3652 | case FS_IOC_SETFLAGS:
> | ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3655:9: error: duplicate case value
> 3655 | case FS_IOC32_SETVERSION:
> | ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3653:9: note: previously used here
> 3653 | case FS_IOC_SETVERSION:
> | ^~~~

Not sure of the right way to fix this while addressing the original
issue that this patch was intended to fix. Looking in fs/ioctl.c, I
see that the some FS_IOC32 values are remapped to the corresponding
FS_IOC values by the compat ioctl syscall entrypoint. Also notice this
comment there:

/* RED-PEN how should LSM module know it's handling 32bit? */
error = security_file_ioctl(f.file, cmd, arg);
if (error)
goto out;

So perhaps this is a defect in LSM that needs to be addressed?


>
>
> vim +3647 security/selinux/hooks.c
>
> 3634
> 3635 static int selinux_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> 3636 unsigned long arg)
> 3637 {
> 3638 const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> 3639 int error = 0;
> 3640
> 3641 switch (cmd) {
> 3642 case FIONREAD:
> 3643 case FIBMAP:
> 3644 case FIGETBSZ:
> 3645 case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS:
> 3646 case FS_IOC_GETVERSION:
> > 3647 case FS_IOC32_GETFLAGS:
> 3648 case FS_IOC32_GETVERSION:
> 3649 error = file_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__GETATTR);
> 3650 break;
> 3651
> 3652 case FS_IOC_SETFLAGS:
> 3653 case FS_IOC_SETVERSION:
> 3654 case FS_IOC32_SETFLAGS:
> 3655 case FS_IOC32_SETVERSION:
> 3656 error = file_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__SETATTR);
> 3657 break;
> 3658
> 3659 /* sys_ioctl() checks */
> 3660 case FIONBIO:
> 3661 case FIOASYNC:
> 3662 error = file_has_perm(cred, file, 0);
> 3663 break;
> 3664
> 3665 case KDSKBENT:
> 3666 case KDSKBSENT:
> 3667 error = cred_has_capability(cred, CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG,
> 3668 CAP_OPT_NONE, true);
> 3669 break;
> 3670
> 3671 case FIOCLEX:
> 3672 case FIONCLEX:
> 3673 if (!selinux_policycap_ioctl_skip_cloexec())
> 3674 error = ioctl_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__IOCTL, (u16) cmd);
> 3675 break;
> 3676
> 3677 /* default case assumes that the command will go
> 3678 * to the file's ioctl() function.
> 3679 */
> 3680 default:
> 3681 error = ioctl_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__IOCTL, (u16) cmd);
> 3682 }
> 3683 return error;
> 3684 }
> 3685