Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: Add compatible and DT bindings for Amlogic C3 Reset Controller

From: Zelong Dong
Date: Tue Sep 12 2023 - 02:39:01 EST


在 2023/7/31 17:17, Neil Armstrong 写道:
On 28/07/2023 17:49, Philipp Zabel wrote:
On Mi, 2023-07-19 at 14:09 +0800, zelong dong wrote:
From: Zelong Dong <zelong.dong@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add new compatible and DT bindings for Amlogic C3 Reset Controller

Signed-off-by: Zelong Dong <zelong.dong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-reset.yaml   |   1 +
  include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,c3-reset.h  | 119 ++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,c3-reset.h

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-reset.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-reset.yaml
index d3fdee89d4f8..f0c6c0df0ce3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-reset.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-reset.yaml
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
        - amlogic,meson-axg-reset # Reset Controller on AXG and compatible SoCs
        - amlogic,meson-a1-reset # Reset Controller on A1 and compatible SoCs
        - amlogic,meson-s4-reset # Reset Controller on S4 and compatible SoCs
+      - amlogic,c3-reset # Reset Controller on C3 and compatible SoCs

    reg:
      maxItems: 1
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,c3-reset.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,c3-reset.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d9127863f603
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,c3-reset.h

Given that this is only included by
arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-c3.dtsi, should this header be
moved to arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic ?

Maybe I missed something, but since when should we move bindings headers to arch/xxx/boot/dts/vendor ?

Neil


regards
Philipp

Hi,
It's been a while, how will we deal with this patch ?
Should we let this patch apply first? If Amlogic reset bindings headers need to be moved to arch/xxx/boot/dts/vendor, could we apply it in a separate change?