Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:31 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:50:06AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > New code should solely use firmware nodes for the specifics and
> > > not any callbacks.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Patches look good to me:
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > for all patches.
>
> Thank you!
>
> > Patch 8 looks HTML on my gmail but I guess the problem
> > is on my side.
>
> The entire series has been sent in the same way, it's quite unlikely that
> the only patch got mangled while others are okay.
>

I'm using cmdg - a command-line interface to gmail - and all patches
look fine. Surprisingly, the web interface indeed does mangle patch 8
for some reason.

Bart