Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/600] 6.1.53-rc1 review

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Sep 12 2023 - 06:39:08 EST


On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 02:19:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sept 2023 at 07:55, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 14:58, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 11/09/23 7:40 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.53 release.
> > > > There are 600 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:44:56 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.53-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > We're seeing this new warning:
> > > -----8<-----
> > > /builds/linux/fs/udf/inode.c:892:6: warning: variable 'newblock' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> > > 892 | if (*err < 0)
> > > | ^~~~~~~~
> > > /builds/linux/fs/udf/inode.c:914:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> > > 914 | return newblock;
> > > | ^~~~~~~~
> > > /builds/linux/fs/udf/inode.c:892:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
> > > 892 | if (*err < 0)
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > 893 | goto out_free;
> > > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > /builds/linux/fs/udf/inode.c:699:34: note: initialize the variable 'newblock' to silence this warning
> > > 699 | udf_pblk_t newblocknum, newblock;
> > > | ^
> > > | = 0
> > > 1 warning generated.
> > > ----->8-----
> > >
> > > That's with Clang 17 (and nightly) on:
> > > * arm
> > > * powerpc
> > > * s390
> >
> > For what it's worth, bisection points to 903b487b5ba6 ("udf: Handle
> > error when adding extent to a file").
>
> I see the following commit is fixing the reported problem.
>
> commit 6d5ab7c2f7cf90877dab8f2bb06eb5ca8edc73ef
> Author: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Dec 30 12:53:41 2022 -0500
>
> udf: initialize newblock to 0
>
> The clang build reports this error
> fs/udf/inode.c:805:6: error: variable 'newblock' is used
> uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true
> [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> if (*err < 0)
> ^~~~~~~~
> newblock is never set before error handling jump.
> Initialize newblock to 0 and remove redundant settings.
>
> Fixes: d8b39db5fab8 ("udf: Handle error when adding extent to a file")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Message-Id: <20221230175341.1629734-1-trix@xxxxxxxxxx>

Wait, where is this commit? I don't see it in Linus's tree either, nor
in linux-next. Where did you find it?

confused,

greg k-h