When I've upstreamed the gpio-regmap driver, I didn't have that much
experience with kernel maintenance, so I've just added myself as a
reviewer. I've gained quite some experience, so I'd like to step up
as a maintainer for it.
Do you think about maintaining your own tree and sending PRs to me?
I'm wondering if - given the little volume of changes to gpio-regmap -
this wouldn't be unnecessary churn? I normally wait for you to Ack any
changes to gpio-regmap code and drivers based on it anyway. Otherwise
if it's just the formal role of the maintainer you're suggesting, then
sure, I'm all for it.