Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing description for tdp_mmu_root_count into kvm_mmu_page

From: Mingwei Zhang
Date: Tue Sep 12 2023 - 14:24:11 EST


On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > Add the description of tdp_mmu_root_count into kvm_mmu_page description and
> > combine it with the description of root_count. tdp_mmu_root_count is an
> > atomic counter used only in TDP MMU. Update the doc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > index 17d90974204e..40daf8beb9b1 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > @@ -229,10 +229,14 @@ Shadow pages contain the following information:
> > can be calculated from the gfn field when used. In addition, when
> > role.direct is set, KVM does not track access permission for each of the
> > gfn. See role.direct and gfn.
> > - root_count:
> > - A counter keeping track of how many hardware registers (guest cr3 or
> > - pdptrs) are now pointing at the page. While this counter is nonzero, the
> > - page cannot be destroyed. See role.invalid.
> > + root_count / tdp_mmu_root_count:
> > + root_count is a reference counter for root shadow pages in Shadow MMU.
> > + vCPUs elevate the refcount when getting a shadow page that will be used as
> > + a root page, i.e. page that will be loaded into hardware directly (CR3,
> > + PDPTRs, nCR3 EPTP). Root pages cannot be destroyed while their refcount is
> > + non-zero. See role.invalid. tdp_mmu_root_count is similar but exclusively
> > + used in TDP MMU as an atomic refcount. When the value is non-zero, it
> > + allows vCPUs acquire references while holding mmu_lock for read.
>
> That last sentence is wrong. *vCPUs* can't acquire references while holding
> mmu_lock for read. And actually, they don't ever put references while holding
> for read either. vCPUs *must* hold mmu_lock for write to obtain a new root,
> Not putting references while holding mmu_lock for read is mostly an implementation
> quirk.
>
> Maybe replace it with this?
>
> tdp_mmu_root_count is similar but exclusively used in the TDP MMU as an
> atomic refcount (select TDP MMU flows walk all roots while holding mmu_lock
> for read, e.g. when clearing dirty bits).

hmm, I think all the content within the bracket is details and we should
not mention them at all. In fact, when I see the implementation, the
last refcount of tdp_mmu_root_count is treated differently. Those
details should be instead mentioned in code or comments instead of
documentation as they may evolve much faster.

So, I will remove the last sentence.