Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86/kexec: UKI support

[Jan Hendrik Farr]

> These are sort of "tautological" arguments. There must be some
> objective reasons why this architecture was chosen instead of
> other (i.e. using what already pre-exists).

I think I misunderstood you in my earlier reply. I do not understand in what way you think my arguments are tautological. Can you elaborate?