Re: [PATCH] of: dynamic: Fix potential memory leak in of_changeset_action()

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 1:29 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:32:08AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 11:14 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > > Fixes: 914d9d831e61 ("of: dynamic: Refactor action prints to not use "%pOF" inside devtree_lock")
> > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309011059.EOdr4im9-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > > >
> > > > > Despite what that says, it was never reported to me. IOW, the added TO
> > > > > and CC lines don't seem to have any effect.
> > > >
> > > > The copy I received did list you in the "To"-header, though.
> >
> > Are you sure that's the header and not in the body?
> >
>
> How these warnings work is that the kbuild bot sends the email to me and
> the oe-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list.  I look it over and send it out
> publicly if the warning seems right.
>
> You're seeing the first email that I hadn't forwarded yet but the second
> forwarded email went out and it reached lkml.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/eaa86211-436d-445b-80bd-84cea5745b5a@kadam.mountain/raw
>
> You're on the To: header so it should have reached you as well...

Ah, okay. I have that one. It just got dumped off to my lkml folder
rather than one I have for 0-day which I actually look at.

Thanks for the explanation. Looks like I need to adjust my filters for these.

Rob