Re: [PATCH v5 08/31] dt-bindings: soc: fsl: cpm_qe: cpm1-scc-qmc: Add support for QMC HDLC

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Wed Sep 13 2023 - 10:42:55 EST


On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 09:26:40AM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:21:58 +0100
> Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:10:18PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > The QMC (QUICC mutichannel controller) is a controller present in some
> > > PowerQUICC SoC such as MPC885.
> > > The QMC HDLC uses the QMC controller to transfer HDLC data.
> > >
> > > Additionally, a framer can be connected to the QMC HDLC.
> > > If present, this framer is the interface between the TDM bus used by the
> > > QMC HDLC and the E1/T1 line.
> > > The QMC HDLC can use this framer to get information about the E1/T1 line
> > > and configure the E1/T1 line.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/fsl,cpm1-scc-qmc.yaml | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/fsl,cpm1-scc-qmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/fsl,cpm1-scc-qmc.yaml
> > > index 82d9beb48e00..b5073531f3f1 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/fsl,cpm1-scc-qmc.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/fsl,cpm1-scc-qmc.yaml
> > > @@ -101,6 +101,16 @@ patternProperties:
> > > Channel assigned Rx time-slots within the Rx time-slots routed by the
> > > TSA to this cell.
> > >
> > > + compatible:
> > > + const: fsl,qmc-hdlc
> > > +
> > > + fsl,framer:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > > + description:
> > > + phandle to the framer node. The framer is in charge of an E1/T1 line
> > > + interface connected to the TDM bus. It can be used to get the E1/T1 line
> > > + status such as link up/down.
> >
> > Sounds like this fsl,framer property should depend on the compatible
> > being present, no?
>
> Well from the implementation point of view, only the QMC HDLC driver uses this
> property.
>
> From the hardware description point of view, this property means that the time slots
> handled by this channel are connected to the framer. So I think it makes sense for
> any channel no matter the compatible (even if compatible is not present).
>
> Should I change and constraint the fsl,framer property to the compatible presence ?
> If so, is the following correct for this contraint ?
> --- 8< ---
> dependencies:
> - fsl,framer: [ compatible ];
> --- 8< ---

The regular sort of
if:
compatible:
contains:
const: foo
then:
required:
- fsl,framer
would fit the bill, no?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature