Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-m4f: Add K3 AM64x SoCs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 13/09/2023 14:36, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:16:41 -0500, Hari Nagalla wrote:
>> K3 AM64x SoC has a Cortex M4F subsystem in the MCU voltage domain.
>> The remote processor's life cycle management and IPC mechanisms are
>> similar across the R5F and M4F cores from remote processor driver
>> point of view. However, there are subtle differences in image loading
>> and starting the M4F subsystems.
>>
>> The YAML binding document provides the various node properties to be
>> configured by the consumers of the M4F subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>>  - Spelling corrections
>>  - Corrected to pass DT checks
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>  - Missed spelling correction to commit message
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>  - Removed unnecessary descriptions and used generic memory region names
>>  - Made mboxes and memory-region optional
>>  - Removed unrelated items from examples
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>>  - Rebased to the latest kernel-next tree
>>  - Added optional sram memory region for m4f device node
>>
>> Changes since v5:
>>  - None
>>
>>  .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml  | 136 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 136 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stericsson,dma40.example.dtb: dma-controller@801c0000: sram:0: [4294967295, 4294967295] is too long
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/stericsson,dma40.yaml#

This looks unrelated but it is caused by this patch. Probably by
conflicting type for 'sram'. It seems we need to make exception for
'sram' in dtschema.

Best regards,
Krzysztof