Re: [PATCH 0/4] Why no v2?

[Guenter Roeck]

On 9/13/23 08:21, Daniel Matyas wrote:
> This is kind of v2, but not exactly. Major changes were applied and
> commits were separated. The latter is the main reason why I did not call
> this v2.

That is neither a reason nor a valid argument. Just call it v2 and mark
the added patch(es) with a changelog along the line of "v2: Added patch".

And a subject of "Why no v2?" is really useless and pointless.

Guenter