Re: [PATCH 06/37] clk: renesas: rzg2l: wait for status bit of SD mux before continuing

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Sep 14 2023 - 07:42:23 EST


Hi Claudiu,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hardware user manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf,
> chapter 7.4.7 Procedure for Switching Clocks by the Dynamic Switching
> Frequency Selectors) specifies that we need to check CPG_PL2SDHI_DSEL for
> SD clock switching status.
>
> Fixes: eaff33646f4cb ("clk: renesas: rzg2l: Add SDHI clk mux support")
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int rzg2l_cpg_sd_clk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> u32 off = GET_REG_OFFSET(hwdata->conf);
> u32 shift = GET_SHIFT(hwdata->conf);
> const u32 clk_src_266 = 2;
> - u32 bitmask;
> + u32 msk, val, bitmask;
> + int ret;
>
> /*
> * As per the HW manual, we should not directly switch from 533 MHz to
> @@ -203,9 +204,6 @@ static int rzg2l_cpg_sd_clk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> */
> bitmask = (GENMASK(GET_WIDTH(hwdata->conf) - 1, 0) << shift) << 16;
> if (index != clk_src_266) {
> - u32 msk, val;
> - int ret;
> -
> writel(bitmask | ((clk_src_266 + 1) << shift), priv->base + off);
>
> msk = off ? CPG_CLKSTATUS_SELSDHI1_STS : CPG_CLKSTATUS_SELSDHI0_STS;
> @@ -221,7 +219,13 @@ static int rzg2l_cpg_sd_clk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
>
> writel(bitmask | ((index + 1) << shift), priv->base + off);
>
> - return 0;
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + CPG_CLKSTATUS, val,
> + !(val & msk), 100,

"msk" may be uninitialized.

> + CPG_SDHI_CLK_SWITCH_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "failed to switch clk source\n");
> +
> + return ret;

This is now (supposed to be) doing the same thing twice, once using
clk_src_266, and then again with the wanted index, so why not introduce
a small helper? That would have avoided the uninitialized variable, too.

I know you're rewriting this code in "[PATCH 18/37] clk: renesas:
rzg2l: refactor sd mux driver", but even after that, you always do
a register write before calling rzg2l_cpg_wait_clk_update_done(),
so it may still be a net win.

> }
>
> static u8 rzg2l_cpg_sd_clk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds