Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] soc: mediatek: svs: add support for mt8188

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Date: Fri Sep 15 2023 - 05:21:01 EST


Il 15/09/23 09:50, Mark Tseng ha scritto:
MT8188 svs gpu uses 2-line high bank and low bank to optimize the
voltage of opp table for higher and lower frequency respectively.

Signed-off-by: Mark Tseng <chun-jen.tseng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 172 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
index 3a2f97cd5272..fafc72df99ee 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
@@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ struct svs_platform_data {
* @dcbdet: svs efuse data
* @dcmdet: svs efuse data
* @turn_pt: 2-line turn point tells which opp_volt calculated by high/low bank
+ * @vbin_turn_pt: voltage bin turn point helps know which svsb_volt should be overridden
* @type: bank type to represent it is 2-line (high/low) bank or 1-line bank
*
* Svs bank will generate suitalbe voltages by below general math equation
@@ -469,6 +470,7 @@ struct svs_bank {
u32 dcbdet;
u32 dcmdet;
u32 turn_pt;
+ u32 vbin_turn_pt;
u32 type;
};
@@ -751,11 +753,12 @@ static int svs_status_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
ret = thermal_zone_get_temp(svsb->tzd, &tzone_temp);
if (ret)
- seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature ignore, turn_pt = %u\n",
- svsb->name, svsb->turn_pt);
+ seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature ignore, vbin_turn_pt = %u, turn_pt = %u\n",
+ svsb->name, svsb->vbin_turn_pt, svsb->turn_pt);
else
- seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature = %d, turn_pt = %u\n",
- svsb->name, tzone_temp, svsb->turn_pt);
+ seq_printf(m, "%s: temperature = %d, vbin_turn_pt = %u, turn_pt = %u\n",
+ svsb->name, tzone_temp, svsb->vbin_turn_pt,
+ svsb->turn_pt);
for (i = 0; i < svsb->opp_count; i++) {
opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(svsb->opp_dev,
@@ -952,6 +955,29 @@ static void svs_get_bank_volts_v3(struct svs_platform *svsp)
for (i = opp_start; i < opp_stop; i++)
if (svsb->volt_flags & SVSB_REMOVE_DVTFIXED_VOLT)
svsb->volt[i] -= svsb->dvt_fixed;
+
+ /* For voltage bin support */
+ if (svsb->opp_dfreq[0] > svsb->freq_base) {
+ svsb->volt[0] = svs_opp_volt_to_bank_volt(svsb->opp_dvolt[0],
+ svsb->volt_step,
+ svsb->volt_base);
+
+ /* Find voltage bin turn point */
+ for (i = 0; i < svsb->opp_count; i++) {
+ if (svsb->opp_dfreq[i] <= svsb->freq_base) {
+ svsb->vbin_turn_pt = i;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Override svs bank voltages */
+ for (i = 1; i < svsb->vbin_turn_pt; i++)
+ svsb->volt[i] = interpolate(svsb->freq_pct[0],
+ svsb->freq_pct[svsb->vbin_turn_pt],
+ svsb->volt[0],
+ svsb->volt[svsb->vbin_turn_pt],
+ svsb->freq_pct[i]);
+ }

This looks like being a new feature that applies to more than just MT8188?
Goes into a different commit.

}
static void svs_set_bank_freq_pct_v3(struct svs_platform *svsp)
@@ -1808,6 +1834,80 @@ static bool svs_mt8192_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
return true;
}
+static bool svs_mt8188_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
+{
+ struct svs_bank *svsb;
+ struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+ u32 idx, i, golden_temp;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < svsp->efuse_max; i++)
+ if (svsp->efuse[i])
+ dev_info(svsp->dev, "M_HW_RES%d: 0x%08x\n",
+ i, svsp->efuse[i]);
+
+ if (!svsp->efuse[5]) {
+ dev_notice(svsp->dev, "svs_efuse[5] = 0x0?\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* Svs efuse parsing */
+ for (idx = 0; idx < svsp->bank_max; idx++) {
+ svsb = &svsp->banks[idx];
+
+ if (svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) {
+ svsb->mtdes = svsp->efuse[5] & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->bdes = (svsp->efuse[5] >> 16) & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->mdes = (svsp->efuse[5] >> 24) & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->dcbdet = (svsp->efuse[15] >> 16) & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->dcmdet = (svsp->efuse[15] >> 24) & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ } else if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH) {
+ svsb->mtdes = svsp->efuse[4] & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->bdes = (svsp->efuse[4] >> 16) & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->mdes = (svsp->efuse[4] >> 24) & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->dcbdet = svsp->efuse[14] & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ svsb->dcmdet = (svsp->efuse[14] >> 8) & GENMASK(7, 0);
+ }
+
+ svsb->vmax += svsb->dvt_fixed;
+ }

The only change between mt8192, 8195 and 8188 is this for loop; can we please
commonize the rest of the function?

+
+ /* Thermal efuse parsing */
+ cell = nvmem_cell_get(svsp->dev, "t-calibration-data");
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cell)) {
+ dev_err(svsp->dev, "no \"t-calibration-data\"? %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(cell));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ svsp->tefuse = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &svsp->tefuse_max);
+ if (IS_ERR(svsp->tefuse)) {
+ dev_err(svsp->dev, "cannot read thermal efuse: %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(svsp->tefuse));
+ nvmem_cell_put(cell);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ svsp->tefuse_max /= sizeof(u32);
+ nvmem_cell_put(cell);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < svsp->tefuse_max; i++)
+ if (svsp->tefuse[i] != 0)
+ break;
+
+ if (i == svsp->tefuse_max)
+ golden_temp = 50; /* All thermal efuse data are 0 */
+ else
+ golden_temp = (svsp->tefuse[0] & GENMASK(31, 24)) >> 24;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < svsp->bank_max; idx++) {
+ svsb = &svsp->banks[idx];
+ svsb->mts = 500;
+ svsb->bts = (((500 * golden_temp + 250460) / 1000) - 25) * 4;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static bool svs_mt8183_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
{
struct svs_bank *svsb;
@@ -2052,7 +2152,7 @@ static int svs_mt8192_platform_probe(struct svs_platform *svsp)
return dev_err_probe(svsp->dev, PTR_ERR(svsp->rst),
"cannot get svs reset control\n");
- dev = svs_add_device_link(svsp, "lvts");
+ dev = svs_add_device_link(svsp, "thermal-sensor");

This is a fix that must go in a different commit with a Fixes tag.

if (IS_ERR(dev))
return dev_err_probe(svsp->dev, PTR_ERR(dev),
"failed to get lvts device\n");
@@ -2173,6 +2273,61 @@ static struct svs_bank svs_mt8192_banks[] = {
},
};

Regards,
Angelo