Re: [PATCH v4 05/42] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add Cirrus EP93xx

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 15/09/2023 10:10, Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add YAML bindings for ep93xx SoC pinctrl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/pinctrl/cirrus,ep9301-pinctrl.yaml    | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cirrus,ep9301-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cirrus,ep9301-pinctrl.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1dbdc5ccc232
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/cirrus,ep9301-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/cirrus,ep9301-pinctrl.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Cirrus ep93xx pins mux controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +  - Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - const: cirrus,ep9301-pinctrl
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - cirrus,ep9302-pinctrl
> +              - cirrus,ep9307-pinctrl
> +              - cirrus,ep9312-pinctrl
> +              - cirrus,ep9315-pinctrl
> +          - const: cirrus,ep9301-pinctrl
> +
> +patternProperties:
> +  '^pins-':
> +    type: object
> +    description: pin node
> +    $ref: pinmux-node.yaml#

Still missing unevaluatedProperties: false

> +
> +    properties:
> +      function:
> +        enum: [ spi, ac97, i2s, pwm, keypad, pata, lcd, gpio ]
> +
> +      groups:
> +        enum: [ ssp, ac97, i2s_on_ssp, i2s_on_ac97, pwm1, gpio1agrp,
> +                gpio2agrp, gpio3agrp, gpio4agrp, gpio6agrp, gpio7agrp,
> +                rasteronsdram0grp, rasteronsdram3grp, keypadgrp, idegrp ]
> +
> +    required:
> +      - function
> +      - groups
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false

Why this was changed? I did not ask for this. I commented in different
place on different level of indentation.

This is unfortunately still wrong. :(

Best regards,
Krzysztof