Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: hwinfo: Add mtk-socinfo driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 15/09/2023 17:26, William-tw Lin wrote:
> dt-binding documentation for mtk-socinfo driver.

Here and in subject, drop driver and instead descrbe hardware.

> mtk-socinfo driver provides SoC-related information.
> Such information includes manufacturer information, SoC name,
> SoC segment name, and SoC marketing name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William-tw Lin <william-tw.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/hwinfo/mtk-socinfo.yaml          | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/mtk-socinfo.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/mtk-socinfo.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/mtk-socinfo.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..74f03f1dc404
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/mtk-socinfo.yaml

Nothing improved.

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.

> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwinfo/mtk-socinfo.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek SoC ChipID
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - William Lin <william-tw.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +  - Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>
> +  - Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +  - AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  MediaTek SoCs store various product information in eFuses, including
> +  Chip ID and Revision fields, usable to identify the manufacturer,
> +  SoC version, plus segment and marketing names.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: mediatek,socinfo

What happened to compatibles? No, this is just wrong and no explained.
You ignored other comments as well. Really, that's not the way to go.

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof