Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] vsock/test: add recv_buf()/send_buf() utility functions and some improvements

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:14:47 +0200 you wrote:
> We recently found that some tests were failing [1].
> 
> The problem was that we were not waiting for all the bytes correctly,
> so we had a partial read. I had initially suggested using MSG_WAITALL,
> but this could have timeout problems.
> 
> Since we already had send_byte() and recv_byte() that handled the timeout,
> but also the expected return value, I moved that code to two new functions
> that we can now use to send/receive generic buffers.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,1/5] vsock/test: add recv_buf() utility function
    (no matching commit)
  - [net-next,2/5] vsock/test: use recv_buf() in vsock_test.c
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a0bcb8357716
  - [net-next,3/5] vsock/test: add send_buf() utility function
    (no matching commit)
  - [net-next,4/5] vsock/test: use send_buf() in vsock_test.c
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2a8548a9bb4c
  - [net-next,5/5] vsock/test: track bytes in MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bc7bea452d32

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html