Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: xfs: Remove duplicate 'the' in transaction sequence process

[Jonathan Corbet]

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:40:54PM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
>> Remove the repeated word "the" in comments.
>
> Patch title looks OK but in this case, the patch description should also match.
> Hint: there is no code comments in the doc below.
>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
>> index 1625d1131093..a0678101a7d0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
>> @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ The transaction sequence looks like this:
>>  2. The second transaction contains a physical update to the free space btrees
>>     of AG 3 to release the former BMBT block and a second physical update to the
>>     free space btrees of AG 7 to release the unmapped file space.
>> -   Observe that the the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
>> +   Observe that the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
>>     when possible.
>>     Attached to the transaction is a an extent free done (EFD) log item.
>>     The EFD contains a pointer to the EFI logged in transaction #1 so that log
>
> Regardless, wait for one or few days before rerolling this patch with
> reviews addressed. It allows other reviewers to catch up and review. You can
> also Cc: me if you'd like.

Bagas, this is a patch removing an extra "the".  We do not need to make
life this hard for such a simple fix.

Charles, the patch is good enough, no need for a third version.

(Next time, though, do wait before resubmitting a patch.  When you do,
put a description of what changed below the "---" line.)

Thanks,

jon