Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Make reverse order of enable() for disable()

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 2:34 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We usually do reverse order of enable() for disable(). Currently, the
> ordering of irq_chip_disable_parent() is not correct in
> rzg2l_gpio_irq_disable(). Fix the incorrect order.
>
> Fixes: db2e5f21a48e ("pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add IRQ domain to handle GPIO interrupt")
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
i.e. will queue in renesas-pinctrl-for-v6.7.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds