RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Add Displayport Alternatemode 2.1 Support

[Patel, Utkarsh H]

Hi Heikki,

Thank you for the feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 1:04 AM
> To: Patel, Utkarsh H <utkarsh.h.patel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; chrome-platform@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Add Displayport
> Alternatemode 2.1 Support
> 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 04:01:44PM +0000, Patel, Utkarsh H wrote:
> 
> > > > b057250704e8..3a747938cdab 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/usb/pd_vdo.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/usb/pd_vdo.h
> > > > @@ -376,6 +376,7 @@
> > > >          | ((vbm) & 0x3) << 9 | (sbu) << 8 | (sbut) << 7 | ((cur) & 0x3) << 5   \
> > > >          | (vbt) << 4 | (sopp) << 3 | ((spd) & 0x7))
> > > >
> > > > +#define VDO_TYPEC_CABLE_SPEED(vdo)     ((vdo) & 0x7)
> > >
> > > I would suggest putting this header modification in a separate
> > > patch; if for some reason we have to revert the Chrome part of the
> > > change, then we won't rip this part out too (some other driver down
> > > the road may use the macro and would break if it were to be
> > > removed). But I'll leave it to Heikki to determine whether that is preferred.
> > >
> > Heikki,  What's your preference here?
> 
> I think separate patch for this like Prashant said.

I will add and re-send the removed [PATCH v2 3/5]  in the next version.  

Sincerely,
Utkarsh Patel.