Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Revamp driver to accommodate different rev structs
From: Neha Malcom Francis
Date: Mon Sep 18 2023 - 23:48:15 EST
Hi Nishanth
On 15/09/23 17:51, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12:16-20230915, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
k3-socinfo.c driver assumes silicon revisions to be 1.0, 2.0 etc. for
every platform. However this typical style is not followed by J721E
(1.0, 1.1) and need not be followed by upcoming silicon revisions as
well. Adapt the driver to be similar to its U-Boot counterpart
(drivers/soc/soc_ti_k3.c) that accounts for this difference on the
basis of partno/family.
Note that we change the order of invocation of
k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names before k3_chipinfo_variant_to_sr so we
have the family name in case error is returned.
Drop reference to U-boot and others. How about this:
The driver assumes that the silicon revisions for every platform are
incremental and one-to-one, corresponding to JTAG_ID's variant field:
1.0, 2.0, and so on. This assumption is wrong for SoCs such as J721E,
where the variant field to revision mapping is 1,0, 1.1. Further,
there are SoCs such as AM65x where the sub-variant version requires
custom decoding of other registers.
Address this by using conditional handling per JTAG ID that requires
an exception with J721E as the first example. To facilitate this
conversion, use macros to identify the JTAG_ID part number and map them
to predefined string array.
Signed-off-by: Thejasvi Konduru <t-konduru@xxxxxx>
Maintain original From or drop this or use Co-developed-by as applicable?
Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
index 6ea9b8c7d335..6de1e3531af9 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
@@ -33,19 +33,37 @@
#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_MFG_TI 0x17
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM65X 0xBB5A
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J721E 0xBB64
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J7200 0xBB6D
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM64X 0xBB38
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J721S2 0xBB75
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM62X 0xBB7E
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J784S4 0xBB80
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM62AX 0xBB8D
+#define JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM62PX 0xBB9D
+
static const struct k3_soc_id {
unsigned int id;
const char *family_name;
} k3_soc_ids[] = {
- { 0xBB5A, "AM65X" },
- { 0xBB64, "J721E" },
- { 0xBB6D, "J7200" },
- { 0xBB38, "AM64X" },
- { 0xBB75, "J721S2"},
- { 0xBB7E, "AM62X" },
- { 0xBB80, "J784S4" },
- { 0xBB8D, "AM62AX" },
- { 0xBB9D, "AM62PX" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM65X, "AM65X" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J721E, "J721E" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J7200, "J7200" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM64X, "AM64X" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J721S2, "J721S2"},
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM62X, "AM62X" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J784S4, "J784S4" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM62AX, "AM62AX" },
+ { JTAG_ID_PARTNO_AM62PX, "AM62PX" },
+};
+
+static char *j721e_rev_string_map[] = {
static const?
+ "1.0", "1.1",
+};
+
+static char *k3_rev_string_map[] = {
We can drop this (See below)
+ "1.0", "2.0", "3.0",
};
static int
@@ -63,6 +81,29 @@ k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names(unsigned int partno,
return -EINVAL;
}
+static int
+k3_chipinfo_variant_to_sr(unsigned int partno, unsigned int variant,
+ struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr)
+{
+ switch (partno) {
+ case JTAG_ID_PARTNO_J721E:
+ if (variant >= ARRAY_SIZE(j721e_rev_string_map))
+ goto bail;
+ soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SR%s",
+ j721e_rev_string_map[variant]);
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (variant >= ARRAY_SIZE(k3_rev_string_map))
+ goto bail;
+ soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SR%s",
+ k3_rev_string_map[variant]);
How about retaining the old logic as is?
soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SR%x.0", variant);
+ }
what if !soc_dev_attr->revision error handling?
+ return 0;
+
+bail:
Rename to something like err_unknown_variant ?
+ return -EINVAL;
return -ENODEV instead to help distinguish between not having memory Vs
not finding a match?
+}
+
static int k3_chipinfo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
@@ -94,7 +135,6 @@ static int k3_chipinfo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
variant = (jtag_id & CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_MASK) >>
CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_SHIFT;
- variant++;
partno_id = (jtag_id & CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_MASK) >>
CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_SHIFT;
@@ -103,15 +143,16 @@ static int k3_chipinfo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!soc_dev_attr)
return -ENOMEM;
- soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SR%x.0", variant);
- if (!soc_dev_attr->revision) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
+ ret = k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names(partno_id, soc_dev_attr);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Unknown SoC JTAGID[0x%08X]\n", jtag_id);
Might be worthwhile to print the errno to distinguish between no mem
fail vs nodev match fail. - see below for k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names
+ ret = -ENODEV;
don't over-ride the return value - that is probably a preceding cleanup patch
for k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names - also to distinguish between -ENOMEM vs
-ENODEV.
goto err;
}
- ret = k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names(partno_id, soc_dev_attr);
+ ret = k3_chipinfo_variant_to_sr(partno_id, variant, soc_dev_attr);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "Unknown SoC JTAGID[0x%08X]\n", jtag_id);
+ dev_err(dev, "Unknown revision for %s\n", soc_dev_attr->family);
ret = -ENODEV;
goto err_free_rev;
}
--
2.34.1
Thanks for the detailed review! I will work on it and send v3.
--
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis