Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue Sep 19 2023 - 14:37:52 EST

Next message: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] [media?] [usb?] KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in imon_probe"
Previous message: Rob Herring: "Re: arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:91:13: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile u16[0]' {aka 'volatile short unsigned int[]'}"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 20:31:50 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The removal of cond_resched() might cause latencies, but then I doubt
> that these museus pieces are used for real work :)

We could simply leave the cond_resched() around but defined as nops for
everything but the "nostalgia club" to keep them from having any regressions.

-- Steve

Next message: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] [media?] [usb?] KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in imon_probe"
Previous message: Rob Herring: "Re: arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:91:13: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile u16[0]' {aka 'volatile short unsigned int[]'}"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]