[PATCH] rculist.h: docu: fix wrong function name

[Philipp Stanner]

The header contains a comment that details why the functions
list_empty_rcu() and list_first_entry_rcu() don't exist. It explains
that they don't exist because standard list_empty() can be used just as
well, but one can not expect sane results from a subsequent, quote,
"list_first_entry_rcu()".

This function (obviously) does not exist. What the comment's author
actually meant was the standard list-function list_first_entry().

Change the function name in that comment from list_first_entry_rcu() to
list_first_entry().

Additionally, add the parenthesis to list_first_or_null_rcu to be congruent
with that entire comment's style.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi!
I hope this helps.
I wasn't 100.000000% sure if that's correct, but I thought asking is for
free 8-)

Regards,
P.
---
 include/linux/rculist.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
index d29740be4833..4837d8892691 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
@@ -331,9 +331,9 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
  * rcu_dereference() is not needed), which means that list_empty() can be
  * used anywhere you would want to use list_empty_rcu().  Just don't
  * expect anything useful to happen if you do a subsequent lockless
- * call to list_first_entry_rcu()!!!
+ * call to list_first_entry()!!!
  *
- * See list_first_or_null_rcu for an alternative.
+ * See list_first_or_null_rcu() for an alternative.
  */
 
 /**
-- 
2.41.0