Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] net: ethernet: implement OA TC6 configuration function
From: Parthiban.Veerasooran
Date: Wed Sep 20 2023 - 08:46:11 EST
Hi Andrew,
On 19/09/23 6:24 pm, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
>>>> +/* Unmasking interrupt fields in IMASK0 */
>>>> +#define HDREM ~BIT(5) /* Header Error Mask */
>>>> +#define LOFEM ~BIT(4) /* Loss of Framing Error Mask */
>>>> +#define RXBOEM ~BIT(3) /* Rx Buffer Overflow Error Mask */
>>>> +#define TXBUEM ~BIT(2) /* Tx Buffer Underflow Error Mask */
>>>> +#define TXBOEM ~BIT(1) /* Tx Buffer Overflow Error Mask */
>>>> +#define TXPEM ~BIT(0) /* Tx Protocol Error Mask */
>>>
>>> Using ~BIT(X) is very usual. I would not do this, Principle of Least
>>> Surprise.
>> Sorry, I don't get your point. Could you please explain bit more?
>
> Look around kernel header files. How often do you see ~BIT(5)? My
> guess it is approximately 0. So i'm suggesting you remove the ~ and
> have the user of the #define assemble the mask and then do the ~ .
Ah ok ok, thanks for the clarification.
Best Regards,
Parthiban V
>
> Andrew