Re: [PATCH] fs/splice: don't block splice_direct_to_actor() after data was read

[Jens Axboe]

On 9/19/23 8:18 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> [+Cc Jens]
> 
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
>> If userspace calls sendfile() with a very large "count" parameter, the
>> kernel can block for a very long time until 2 GiB (0x7ffff000 bytes)
>> have been read from the hard disk and pushed into the socket buffer.
>>
>> Usually, that is not a problem, because the socket write buffer gets
>> filled quickly, and if the socket is non-blocking, the last
>> direct_splice_actor() call will return -EAGAIN, causing
>> splice_direct_to_actor() to break from the loop, and sendfile() will
>> return a partial transfer.
>>
>> However, if the network happens to be faster than the hard disk, and
>> the socket buffer keeps getting drained between two
>> generic_file_read_iter() calls, the sendfile() system call can keep
>> running for a long time, blocking for disk I/O over and over.
>>
>> That is undesirable, because it can block the calling process for too
>> long.  I discovered a problem where nginx would block for so long that
>> it would drop the HTTP connection because the kernel had just
>> transferred 2 GiB in one call, and the HTTP socket was not writable
>> (EPOLLOUT) for more than 60 seconds, resulting in a timeout:
>>
>>   sendfile(4, 12, [5518919528] => [5884939344], 1813448856) = 366019816 <3.033067>
>>   sendfile(4, 12, [5884939344], 1447429040) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) <0.000037>
>>   epoll_wait(9, [{EPOLLOUT, {u32=2181955104, u64=140572166585888}}], 512, 60000) = 1 <0.003355>
>>   gettimeofday({tv_sec=1667508799, tv_usec=201201}, NULL) = 0 <0.000024>
>>   sendfile(4, 12, [5884939344] => [8032418896], 2147480496) = 2147479552 <10.727970>
>>   writev(4, [], 0) = 0 <0.000439>
>>   epoll_wait(9, [], 512, 60000) = 0 <60.060430>
>>   gettimeofday({tv_sec=1667508869, tv_usec=991046}, NULL) = 0 <0.000078>
>>   write(5, "10.40.5.23 - - [03/Nov/2022:21:5"..., 124) = 124 <0.001097>
>>   close(12) = 0 <0.000063>
>>   close(4)  = 0 <0.000091>
>>
>> In newer nginx versions (since 1.21.4), this problem was worked around
>> by defaulting "sendfile_max_chunk" to 2 MiB:
>>
>>  https://github.com/nginx/nginx/commit/5636e7f7b4
>>
>> Instead of asking userspace to provide an artificial upper limit, I'd
>> like the kernel to block for disk I/O at most once, and then pass back
>> control to userspace.
>>
>> There is prior art for this kind of behavior in filemap_read():
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * If we've already successfully copied some data, then we
>> 	 * can no longer safely return -EIOCBQUEUED. Hence mark
>> 	 * an async read NOWAIT at that point.
>> 	 */
>> 	if ((iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ) && already_read)
>> 		iocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;
>>
>> This modifies the caller-provided "struct kiocb", which has an effect
>> on repeated filemap_read() calls.  This effect however vanishes
>> because the "struct kiocb" is not persistent; splice_direct_to_actor()
>> doesn't have one, and each generic_file_splice_read() call initializes
>> a new one, losing the "IOCB_NOWAIT" flag that was injected by
>> filemap_read().
>>
>> There was no way to make generic_file_splice_read() aware that
>> IOCB_NOWAIT was desired because some data had already been transferred
>> in a previous call:
>>
>> - checking whether the input file has O_NONBLOCK doesn't work because
>>   this should be fixed even if the input file is not non-blocking
>>
>> - the SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK flag is not appropriate because it affects
>>   only whether pipe operations are non-blocking, not whether
>>   file/socket operations are non-blocking
>>
>> Since there are no other parameters, I suggest adding the
>> SPLICE_F_NOWAIT flag, which is similar to SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK, but
>> affects the "non-pipe" file descriptor passed to sendfile() or
>> splice().  It translates to IOCB_NOWAIT for regular files.  For now, I
>> have documented the flag to be kernel-internal with a high bit, like
>> io_uring does with SPLICE_F_FD_IN_FIXED, but making this part of the
>> system call ABI may be a good idea as well.

I think adding the flag for this case makes sense, and also exposing it
on the UAPI side. My only concern is full coverage of it. We can't
really have a SPLICE_F_NOWAIT flag that only applies to some cases.

That said, asking for a 2G splice, and getting a 2G splice no matter how
slow it may be, is a bit of a "doctor it hurts when I..." scenario.

-- 
Jens Axboe