Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: ti: am642-evm: Add overlay for NAND expansion card

From: Andrew Davis
Date: Thu Sep 21 2023 - 16:16:55 EST


On 9/21/23 6:37 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 20/09/2023 20:06, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 9/20/23 11:44 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 18:18-20230920, Roger Quadros wrote:


On 20/09/2023 16:58, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 16:34-20230920, Roger Quadros wrote:
The NAND expansion card plugs in over the HSE (High Speed Expansion)
connector. Add support for it.

Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile               |   1 +
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-nand.dtso | 140 ++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 141 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-nand.dtso

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
index 06d6f264f292..ece74085a6be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am62p5-sk.dtb
    # Boards with AM64x SoC
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-evm.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-evm-nand.dtbo
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-sk.dtb
  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-tqma64xxl-mbax4xxl.dtb

Also see https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230911165610.GA1362932-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/

you may not get the dtbo installed when doing make dtbs_install

[...]


$ v8make dtbs_install INSTALL_DTBS_PATH=/tmp
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-beagleplay.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-phyboard-lyra-rdk.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-sk.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-verdin-nonwifi-dahlia.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-verdin-nonwifi-dev.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-verdin-nonwifi-yavia.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-verdin-wifi-dahlia.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-verdin-wifi-dev.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am625-verdin-wifi-yavia.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am62-lp-sk.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am62x-sk-hdmi-audio.dtbo
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am642-evm.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am642-evm-nand.dtbo
^^^^
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dtb
   INSTALL /tmp/ti/k3-am642-sk.dtb


What did I miss?

I missed it, actually. See Rob's comment:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_Jsq+GR3hP6hFvFn2z5aXvSXnh9butD3aKZ-y_XJgx0_YPTw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Having orphan dtbo is apparently frowned upon


And if you apply these overlays to the base DTB then it gets
symbols added automatically, no need for your patch [1/2] here.


Is this OK?

k3-am642-evm-nand-dtbs := k3-am642-evm.dtb k3-am642-evm-nand.dtbo
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-evm-nand.dtb

So patch 1 is not required in this case but we have an
extra dtb file which is not really required.


While I agree we will end up with several pre-overlayed DTB files
that are arguably not required as they could be later built/applied,
until we find a better way to check at build time these overlays
need applied to something as a test.

I have 2 more issues to point out

1)
With existing examples e.g. J7200 EVM
wouldn't k3-j7200-evm.dtb include the k3-j7200-evm-quad-port-eth-exp.dtbo?
Is this what we really want?

likewise for k3-j721e-evm.dtb and k3-am654-gp-evm.dtb


Yes, that is the idea, the base-board.dtb is just the raw main board, but
the "EVM" when you buy it comes with the quad-port daughtercard attached.
That is what we consider the "EVM" and the DTB names match that.

2)
Another issue (unrelated to this change) is the below warning:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-nand.dtso:65.8-140.3: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /fragment@3/__overlay__: Relying on default #address-cells value
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-nand.dtso:65.8-140.3: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /fragment@3/__overlay__: Relying on default #size-cells value

This is because we use the 'ranges' property in the gpmc0 node
and the compiler doesn't know the #address/size-cells of the
parent node.

Is there a trick to specify it in the dtso file?


Hmm, seems like a tricky one. Do you really need to do the ranges here?
Could you use the default `ranges;` for gpmc0? Then do the range translation
down inside the nand node to keep the partition addresses sane.

Andrew