Re: [PATCH] staging: speakup: Remove repeated word in comments

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:48:47PM +0800, huangli05 wrote:
> Remove the repeated word "the" in comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: huangli05 <huangli05@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_soft.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_soft.c b/drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_soft.c
> index 6d446824677b..6549bfb96e7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_soft.c
> +++ b/drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_soft.c
> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static int softsynth_adjust(struct spk_synth *synth, struct st_var_header *var)
>  	if (var->var_id != PUNC_LEVEL)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/* We want to set the the speech synthesis punctuation level
> +	/* We want to set the speech synthesis punctuation level
>  	 * accordingly, so it properly tunes speaking A_PUNC characters */
>  	var_data = var->data;
>  	if (!var_data)
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper
  Subject: line should look like.

- It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either
  the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to
  match).  Please read the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for how to do this
  correctly.

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot