RE: [PATCH v1 0/3] dma: sf-pdma: various sf-pdma updates for the mpfs platform

[Shravan.Chippa]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 3:40 PM
> To: shravan Chippa - I35088 <Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: green.wan@xxxxxxxxxx; vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; palmer@xxxxxxxxxx;
> dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nagasuresh Relli -
> I67208 <Nagasuresh.Relli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Praveen Kumar - I30718
> <Praveen.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] dma: sf-pdma: various sf-pdma updates for the
> mpfs platform
> 
> Hey,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:20:36PM +0530, shravan chippa wrote:
> > From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This series does the following
> > 1. Adds a PolarFire SoC specific compatible and code to support for
> > out-of-order dma transfers
> >
> > 2. Adds generic device tree bindings support by using
> > of_dma_controller_register()
> >
> > Shravan Chippa (3):
> >   dmaengine: sf-pdma: Support of_dma_controller_register()
> >   dt-bindings: dma: sf-pdma: add new compatible name
> >   dmaengine: sf-pdma: add mpfs-pdma compatible name
> 
> It looks like you're missing a patch here that adds this new set of compatibles
> to the devicetree?

I will add a new patch for this.

Thanks,
Shravan

> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.