Re: [PATCH v10 09/10] x86/resctrl: Add support for the files for MON groups only
From: Moger, Babu
Date: Mon Oct 02 2023 - 13:27:13 EST
Hi Reinette,
Forgot to respond to this.
On 9/27/23 17:02, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 9/27/2023 2:34 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> Hi Reinette,
>>
>> On 9/27/2023 1:34 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>> Hi Babu,
>>>
>>> On 9/15/2023 3:42 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>>> There are 3 types resctrl root files.
>>> Considering patch #4, should this be "base"?
>> Sure.
>>>
>>>> 1. RFTYPE_BASE : Files common for both MON and CTRL groups
>>>> 2. RFTYPE_BASE | RFTYPE_CTRL : Files only for CTRL groups
>>> If (1) is accurate then I cannot see how (2) can be accurate.
>>
>> How about ?
>>
>> 2. RFTYPE_BASE | RFTYPE_CTRL : Files for the CTRL groups
>
> Yes, this is accurate. Even so, this snippet does not seem
> necessary considering the changelog rewrite below.
Sure. Removed this whole snippet.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> 3. RFTYPE_BASE | RFTYPE_MON : Files only for MON groups
>>> Same here.
>>
>> How bout?
>>
>> 3. RFTYPE_BASE | RFTYPE_MON : Files for the MON groups
>
> Same comment.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Files only for the MON groups are not supported now. Add the
>>>> support to create these files.
>>> This is not accurate. Files "only for the MON groups" are
>>> actually the only monitor files that *are* supported. The
>>> problem being fixed here is that monitor files are
>>> not supported for CTRL_MON groups.
>>>
>>> I made an attempt at rewriting this commit message but I am
>>> doing it quite quickly so please do improve it:
>>>
>>> Files unique to monitoring groups have the
>>> RFTYPE_MON flag. When a new monitoring group is created
>>> the resctrl files with flags RFTYPE_BASE (files common
>>> to all resource groups) and RFTYPE_MON (files unique
>>> to monitoring groups) are created to support interacting with
>>> the new monitoring group.
>>>
>>> A resource group can support both monitoring and control,
>>> also termed a CTRL_MON resource group. CTRL_MON groups should
>>> get both monitoring and control resctrl files but that
>>> is not the case. Only the RFTYPE_BASE and RFTYPE_CTRL files
>>> are created for CTRL_MON groups. This is not a problem
>>> because there are no monitoring specific files with the
>>> RFTYPE_MON flag associated with resource groups.
>>>
>>> A later patch introduces the first RFTYPE_MON file for
>>> resource groups so fix resctrl file creation for CTRL_MON
>>> groups to ensure that monitoring files, those with the
>>> RFTYPE_MON flag, are also created.
>>
>> Looks good with slight change(only last para. Rest looks good). Just removed the "fix".
>>
>> A later patch introduces the first RFTYPE_MON file for
>> resource groups. Add the changes to create the files for CTRL_MON
>> groups to ensure that monitoring files, those with the RFTYPE_MON flag,
>> are also created.
>>
>
> "Add the changes to" is not necessary. With this and removing the "fix" it
> can be summarized to:
> A later patch introduces the first monitoring specific (RFTYPE_MON)
> file for resource groups. Ensure that files with the RFTYPE_MON
> flag are created for CTRL_MON groups.
>
> What do you think?
>
Yes. Looks good.
--
Thanks
Babu Moger