Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] debugfs_create_regset32() support 8/16 bit width registers

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023, at 20:37, Frank Li wrote:
> Enhance the flexibility of `debugfs_create_regset32()` to support registers
> of various bit widths. The key changes are as follows:
>
> 1. Renamed '*reg32' and '*regset32' to '*reg' and '*regset' in relevant
>    code to reflect that the register width is not limited to 32 bits.
>
> 2. Added 'size' and 'bigendian' fields to the `struct debugfs_reg` to allow
>    for specifying the size and endianness of registers. These additions
>    enable `debugfs_create_regset()` to support a wider range of register
>    types.
>
> 3. When 'size' is set to 0, it signifies a 32-bit register. This change
>    maintains compatibility with existing code that assumes 32-bit
>    registers.
>
> Improve the versatility of `debugfs_create_regset()` and enable it to
> handle registers of different sizes and endianness, offering greater
> flexibility for debugging and monitoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>

This version looks correct to me, I see no fundamental problems with it.
In fact, you could list "support for ioport_map() output" to the features
above.

A few other thoughts from my side, all of which could be ignored:

- if the ioport access is not an important feature, we can instead
  support 64-bit readl() as I commented in a previous email. We just
  can't easily have both.

- instead of treating every value of "regs->size" other than 1 and 2
  as meaning '32-bit read', I would explicitly check for 0 and 4
  here

- Another more complicated but also more featureful variant would
  be to use the 'regmap' infrastructure as the abstraction, this would
  also provide access to big-endian, variable register width
  (including 64-bit), and pio, along with additional features and
  other bus types. Not sure it's worth it, but could be interesting
  to try out.

     Arnd