Re: [PATCH 19/21] scsi: sd: Add WRITE_ATOMIC_16 support

[Bart Van Assche]

On 10/2/23 04:36, John Garry wrote:
> On 29/09/2023 18:59, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 9/29/23 03:27, John Garry wrote:
> > > +static blk_status_t sd_setup_atomic_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
> > > +                    sector_t lba, unsigned int nr_blocks,
> > > +                    unsigned char flags)
> > > +{
> > > +    cmd->cmd_len  = 16;
> > > +    cmd->cmnd[0]  = WRITE_ATOMIC_16;
> > > +    cmd->cmnd[1]  = flags;
> > > +    put_unaligned_be64(lba, &cmd->cmnd[2]);
> > > +    cmd->cmnd[10] = 0;
> > > +    cmd->cmnd[11] = 0;
> > > +    put_unaligned_be16(nr_blocks, &cmd->cmnd[12]);
> > > +    cmd->cmnd[14] = 0;
> > > +    cmd->cmnd[15] = 0;
> > > +
> > > +    return BLK_STS_OK;
> > > +}
> >
> > Please store the 'dld' value in the GROUP NUMBER field. See e.g.
> > sd_setup_rw16_cmnd().
>
> Are you sure that WRITE ATOMIC (16) supports dld?

Hi John,

I was assuming that DLD would be supported by the WRITE ATOMIC(16) 
command. After having taken another look at the latest SBC-5 draft
I see that the DLD2/DLD1/DLD0 bits are not present in the WRITE 
ATOMIC(16) command. So please ignore my comment above.

Thanks,

Bart.