Re: bluetooth issues since kernel 6.4 - not discovering other bt devices - /linux/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
From: Erik Dobák
Date: Tue Oct 03 2023 - 12:11:03 EST
Sorry Tomasz,
that must have been a reality glitch with your commit (cant find the
page refering to your commit now). But yes it is probably a kernel bug
as it manifests kernels 6.4 and not in the 6.1 LTS version.
Yours
E
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 15:08, Tomasz Moń <tomasz.mon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 14:42 +0200, Erik Dobák wrote:
> > Sure here you go:
> >
> > # lsusb -d 04c5:1670 -v
> >
> > Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04c5:1670 Fujitsu, Ltd Bluetooth Radio
> > Device Descriptor:
> > bLength 18
> > bDescriptorType 1
> > bcdUSB 1.00
> > bDeviceClass 224 Wireless
> > bDeviceSubClass 1 Radio Frequency
> > bDeviceProtocol 1 Bluetooth
> > bMaxPacketSize0 64
> > idVendor 0x04c5 Fujitsu, Ltd
> > idProduct 0x1670
> > bcdDevice 0.00
> > iManufacturer 1 Realtek
> > iProduct 2 Bluetooth Radio
> > iSerial 3 00e04c000001
> > bNumConfigurations 1
> > Configuration Descriptor:
> > bLength 9
> > bDescriptorType 2
> > wTotalLength 0x00b1
> > bNumInterfaces 2
> > bConfigurationValue 1
> > iConfiguration 0
> > bmAttributes 0xe0
> > Self Powered
> > Remote Wakeup
> > MaxPower 500mA
> > Interface Descriptor:
> > bLength 9
> > bDescriptorType 4
> > bInterfaceNumber 0
> > bAlternateSetting 0
> > bNumEndpoints 3
> > bInterfaceClass 224 Wireless
> > bInterfaceSubClass 1 Radio Frequency
> > bInterfaceProtocol 1 Bluetooth
> > iInterface 4 Bluetooth Radio
>
> I have no idea why you referred to my commits, i.e. c13380a55522
> ("Bluetooth: btusb: Do not require hardcoded interface numbers") later
> fixed by eaac6e223a0d ("Bluetooth: btusb: Fix bluetooth on Intel
> Macbook 2014") in the first place.
>
> BTUSB_IFNUM_2 is not even getting set for this device and therefore the
> patches have no impact on your issue. If you were affected, like the
> Intel Macbook 2014 was, then bear in mind that the issue would manifest
> as btusb driver not even binding to the device. From your emails
> however it appears that the issue is something different.
>
> I honestly don't think it has anything to do with my patches. If you
> know a Linux version where your bluetooth device works, then the next
> step would be to bisect to find the first bad commit.
>
> Best Regards,
> Tomasz Moń