Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: acpi: Fix pointer declarations in parameter lists which included whitespace spuriously

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:03 AM Jonathan Bergh
<bergh.jonathan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fixed issues where pointer declarations in parameter lists included
> whitespace before the parameter names and should not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bergh <bergh.jonathan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/osl.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index f725813d0cce..29e0005c30aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_os_unmap_generic_address);
>
>  #ifdef ACPI_FUTURE_USAGE
>  acpi_status
> -acpi_os_get_physical_address(void *virt, acpi_physical_address * phys)
> +acpi_os_get_physical_address(void *virt, acpi_physical_address *phys)
>  {
>         if (!phys || !virt)
>                 return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ acpi_os_write_memory(acpi_physical_address phys_addr, u64 value, u32 width)
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>  acpi_status
> -acpi_os_read_pci_configuration(struct acpi_pci_id * pci_id, u32 reg,
> +acpi_os_read_pci_configuration(struct acpi_pci_id *pci_id, u32 reg,
>                                u64 *value, u32 width)
>  {
>         int result, size;
> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ acpi_os_read_pci_configuration(struct acpi_pci_id * pci_id, u32 reg,
>  }
>
>  acpi_status
> -acpi_os_write_pci_configuration(struct acpi_pci_id * pci_id, u32 reg,
> +acpi_os_write_pci_configuration(struct acpi_pci_id *pci_id, u32 reg,
>                                 u64 value, u32 width)
>  {
>         int result, size;
> @@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ bool acpi_queue_hotplug_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  }
>
>  acpi_status
> -acpi_os_create_semaphore(u32 max_units, u32 initial_units, acpi_handle * handle)
> +acpi_os_create_semaphore(u32 max_units, u32 initial_units, acpi_handle *handle)
>  {
>         struct semaphore *sem = NULL;
>
> @@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@ void acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_spinlock lockp, acpi_cpu_flags flags)
>   ******************************************************************************/
>
>  acpi_status
> -acpi_os_create_cache(char *name, u16 size, u16 depth, acpi_cache_t ** cache)
> +acpi_os_create_cache(char *name, u16 size, u16 depth, acpi_cache_t **cache)
>  {
>         *cache = kmem_cache_create(name, size, 0, 0, NULL);
>         if (*cache == NULL)
> @@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@ acpi_os_create_cache(char *name, u16 size, u16 depth, acpi_cache_t ** cache)
>   *
>   ******************************************************************************/
>
> -acpi_status acpi_os_purge_cache(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> +acpi_status acpi_os_purge_cache(acpi_cache_t *cache)
>  {
>         kmem_cache_shrink(cache);
>         return (AE_OK);
> @@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_purge_cache(acpi_cache_t * cache)
>   *
>   ******************************************************************************/
>
> -acpi_status acpi_os_delete_cache(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> +acpi_status acpi_os_delete_cache(acpi_cache_t *cache)
>  {
>         kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
>         return (AE_OK);
> @@ -1614,7 +1614,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_delete_cache(acpi_cache_t * cache)
>   *
>   ******************************************************************************/
>
> -acpi_status acpi_os_release_object(acpi_cache_t * cache, void *object)
> +acpi_status acpi_os_release_object(acpi_cache_t *cache, void *object)
>  {
>         kmem_cache_free(cache, object);
>         return (AE_OK);
> --

Applied along with the [2-3/3] as 6.7 material with edits in the
subjects and changelogs.

Thanks!