Re: [PATCH v2 -next 3/4] RISC-V: cacheflush: Initialize CBO variables on ACPI systems

[Samuel Holland]

On 2023-09-27 12:00 PM, Sunil V L wrote:
> Using new interface to get the CBO block size information in RHCT,
> initialize the variables on ACPI platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> index f1387272a551..8e59644e473c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> @@ -3,7 +3,9 @@
>   * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -124,15 +126,38 @@ void __init riscv_init_cbo_blocksizes(void)
>  	unsigned long cbom_hartid, cboz_hartid;
>  	u32 cbom_block_size = 0, cboz_block_size = 0;
>  	struct device_node *node;
> +	struct acpi_table_header *rhct;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	unsigned int cpu;
> +
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
> +		status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_RHCT, 0, &rhct);
> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +			return;
> +	}
>  
> -	for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> -		/* set block-size for cbom and/or cboz extension if available */
> -		cbo_get_block_size(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size",
> -				   &cbom_block_size, &cbom_hartid);
> -		cbo_get_block_size(node, "riscv,cboz-block-size",
> -				   &cboz_block_size, &cboz_hartid);
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		if (acpi_disabled) {
> +			node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> +			if (!node) {
> +				pr_warn("Unable to find cpu node\n");
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			/* set block-size for cbom and/or cboz extension if available */
> +			cbo_get_block_size(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size",
> +					   &cbom_block_size, &cbom_hartid);
> +			cbo_get_block_size(node, "riscv,cboz-block-size",
> +					   &cboz_block_size, &cboz_hartid);

This leaks a reference to the device node.

> +		} else {
> +			acpi_get_cbo_block_size(rhct, cpu, &cbom_block_size,
> +						&cboz_block_size, NULL);

This function loops through the whole RHCT already. Why do we need to call it
for each CPU? Can't we just call it once, and have it do the same consistency
checks as cbo_get_block_size()?

In that case, the DT path could keep the for_each_of_cpu_node() loop.

Regards,
Samuel

> +		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!acpi_disabled && rhct)
> +		acpi_put_table((struct acpi_table_header *)rhct);
> +
>  	if (cbom_block_size)
>  		riscv_cbom_block_size = cbom_block_size;
>