Re: [PATCH] x86_64: test that userspace stack is in fact NX

[Dave Hansen]

On 10/3/23 12:30, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Because not having NX in 2023 on any system that is threatened is a
>> big security vulnerability in itself, and whether the vendor or owner
>> intentionally did that or not doesn't really matter, and a failing
>> kernel testcase will be the least of their problems.
> BTW., it's also questionable whether the owner is *aware* of the fact that 
> NX is not available: what if some kernel debug option cleared the NX flag, 
> unintended, or there's some serious firmware bug?
> 
> However unlikely those situations might be, I think unconditionally warning 
> about NX not available is a very 2023 thing to do.

100% agree for x86_64.  Any sane x86_64 system has NX and the rest are
noise that can live with the error message, unless someone shows up with
a compelling reason why not.

For 32-bit, the situation is reversed.  The majority of 32-bit-only CPUs
never had NX.  The only reason to even *do* this check on 32-bit is that
we think folks are running i386 kernels on x86_64 hardware _or_ we just
don't care about 32-bit in the first place.

In the end, I think if we're going to do this test on i386, we should
_also_ do the 5-lines-of-code CPUID check.  But I honestly don't care
that much.  I wouldn't NAK (or not merge) this patch over it.