Re: [PATCH v6 08/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has

From: Reinette Chatre
Date: Tue Oct 03 2023 - 17:13:53 EST


Hi James,

On 9/14/2023 10:21 AM, James Morse wrote:

...

> @@ -796,13 +817,30 @@ void mbm_setup_overflow_handler(struct rdt_domain *dom, unsigned long delay_ms)
> static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> u32 idx_limit = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
> + u32 num_closid = resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(r);
> struct rmid_entry *entry = NULL;
> + int err = 0, i;
> u32 idx;
> - int i;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> + int *tmp;
> +
> + tmp = kcalloc(num_closid, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);

Shouldn't this rather be sizeof(unsigned int) to match the type it will store?

> + if (!tmp) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + closid_num_dirty_rmid = tmp;
> + }
>
> rmid_ptrs = kcalloc(idx_limit, sizeof(struct rmid_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!rmid_ptrs)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!rmid_ptrs) {
> + kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < idx_limit; i++) {
> entry = &rmid_ptrs[i];
> @@ -822,13 +860,21 @@ static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
> entry = __rmid_entry(idx);
> list_del(&entry->list);
>
> - return 0;
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> void resctrl_exit_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> + kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
> + closid_num_dirty_rmid = NULL;
> + }
> +
> kfree(rmid_ptrs);
> rmid_ptrs = NULL;
>

Awaiting response on patch #2 related to above hunk.

Reinette