Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] vsock/virtio: continue MSG_ZEROCOPY support

[Arseniy Krasnov]

On 04.10.2023 19:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 07:22:04PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04.10.2023 08:25, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03.10.2023 19:26, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>>> Hi Arseniy,
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 12:02:56AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> this patchset contains second and third parts of another big patchset
>>>>> for MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230701063947.3422088-1-AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>>
>>>>> During review of this series, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> suggested to split it for three parts to simplify review and merging:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) virtio and vhost updates (for fragged skbs) (merged to net-next, see
>>>>>   link below)
>>>>> 2) AF_VSOCK updates (allows to enable MSG_ZEROCOPY mode and read
>>>>>   tx completions) and update for Documentation/. <-- this patchset
>>>>> 3) Updates for tests and utils. <-- this patchset
>>>>>
>>>>> Part 1) was merged:
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=71b263e79370348349553ecdf46f4a69eb436dc7
>>>>>
>>>>> Head for this patchset is:
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=236f3873b517acfaf949c23bb2d5dec13bfd2da2
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to v1:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230922052428.4005676-1-avkrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>>
>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>>> * Patchset rebased and tested on new HEAD of net-next (see hash above).
>>>>> * See per-patch changelog after ---.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for this new version.
>>>> I started to include vsock_uring_test in my test suite and tests are
>>>> going well.
>>>>
>>>> I reviewed code patches, I still need to review the tests.
>>>> I'll do that by the end of the week, but they looks good!
>>>
>>> Thanks for review! Ok, I'll wait for tests review, and then send next
>>> version.
>>
>> Got your comments from review. I'll update patches by:
>> 1) Trying to avoid touching util.c/util.h
> 
> I mean, we can touch it ;-) but for this case it looks like we don't
> need most of that functions to be there.
> 
> At least for now. If we need them to be used in more places, then it
> makes sense.

Yes, I mean touching without need :)

> 
>> 2) Add new header with functions shared between util vsock_perf and
>> tests
> 
> We can do this also later in another PR as cleanup if you prefer.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>