Re: [PATCH 0/4] tracing: improve symbolic printing
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Oct 04 2023 - 14:45:20 EST
On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 20:38:46 +0200
Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 09:22 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >
> > Potentially naive question - the trace point holds enum skb_drop_reason.
> > The user space can get the names from BTF. Can we not teach user space
> > to generically look up names of enums in BTF?
>
> I'll note that, unrelated to the discussion about whether or not we
> could use BTF, we couldn't do it in this case anyway since the whole
> drop reasons aren't captured in enum skb_drop_reason, that contains only
> the core ones, and now other subsystems are adding their own somewhat
> dynamically later.
Another issue with using BTF, is that the BTF would need to be saved in the
trace.dat or perf.data file, as many times the trace data is moved off to
another machine for offline analysis. And using the vmlinux would not be
useful, because there is several times you have multiple trace files for
various versions of a build and that would require mapping which
vmlinux/btf file goes with which trace data.
Right now, the conversions can easily be saved in the trace file directly.
-- Steve