Re: stack leak via uart_get_info() ?

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:55:34PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:34:21PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > If this check ever triggers
> > 
> > 	static int uart_get_info(struct tty_port *port, struct serial_struct *retinfo)
> > 	{
> > 
> > 		uport = uart_port_check(state);
> > 	        if (!uport)
> > 	                goto out;
> > 
> > then all those sysfs users will print stack contents to userspace.
> > 
> > Can it trigger while sysfs read is executing?
> 
> I don't think it can ever fail, we don't even check the result in other
> places, so it should all be fine.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > @@ -775,6 +775,8 @@ static int uart_get_info(struct tty_port *port, struct serial_struct *retinfo)
> >  	struct uart_port *uport;
> >  	int ret = -ENODEV;
> >  
> > +	*retinfo = (struct serial_struct){};
> 
> This is good (although I hate the implied memcpy), a real memset would
> be best to ensure that any holes are also filled.  Want to do that, or
> want me to?

I don't mind memset(), but "struct serial_struct" structure has kernel
pointers:

	unsigned char* iomem_base;

so it is not shipped to userspace, so padding isn't an issue.