[PATCH 5/5] perf intel-pt: Prefer get_unaligned_le64 to memcpy_le64

[Adrian Hunter]

Use get_unaligned_le64() instead of memcpy_le64(..., 8) because it produces
simpler code.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c
index 7a90218aecb1..bccb988a7a44 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_mnt(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
 	if (len < 11)
 		return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
 	packet->type = INTEL_PT_MNT;
-	memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 3, 8);
+	packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 3);
 	return 11;
 }
 
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_bip_8(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
 		return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
 	packet->type = INTEL_PT_BIP;
 	packet->count = buf[0] >> 3;
-	memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 1, 8);
+	packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 1);
 	return 9;
 }
 
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_evd(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
 	packet->type = INTEL_PT_EVD;
 	packet->count = buf[2] & 0x3f;
 	packet->payload = buf[3];
-	memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 3, 8);
+	packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 3);
 	return 11;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1