Re: PPS functionality for Intel Timed I/O

[andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:57:37AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On 06/10/23 10:34, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:34:10AM +0300, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:23:09AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > > > On 06/10/23 07:31, N, Pandith wrote:
> > > > > > From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 1:16 PM
> > > > > > On 15/02/23 08:09, N, Pandith wrote:

[snip]

> > > > > > Regarding Documentation/driver-api/pps.rst let me suggest you to prose a
> > > > > > separate patch to rewrite the Generators section in such a way you easily can add
> > > > > > your solution at the end. A possible example is attached but feel free to rewrite it
> > > > > > according to your needs.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > Ok, we are updating documentation as you have suggested as a separate patch.
> > > > > Can we use your "Signed-off-by" tag for attached patch.
> > > > 
> > > > If you just followed my suggestion then it's OK for me.
> > > 
> > > But can we have your SoB or not? If so, please provide it explicitly as
> > > the (Linux kernel) process requires.
> > 
> > Or even better if you provide the patch itself or apply directly to your tree
> > that we can rebase the our stuff on.
> 
> Just send the patch to the kernel mail list and, if OK, I'm going to sign it
> and forwarding to Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Okay, now it's clear, thank you!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko