In subject: "drm/virtio" to match previous history.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:15:31PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>This *is* a functional change: Previously "vga" was only true for
Should be no functional change, just for cleanup purpose.
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
index add075681e18..3a368304475a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int virtio_gpu_pci_quirk(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev->dev);
const char *pname = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
- bool vga = (pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA;
+ bool vga = pci_is_vga(pdev);
PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA (0x0300). Now it will be true for both
PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA (0x0300) and PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_OTHER (0x0380).
Is that desirable? I can't tell. Maybe the GPU folks will chime in.
int ret;
DRM_INFO("pci: %s detected at %s\n",
--
2.34.1