Re: [PATCH smp,csd] Throw an error if a CSD lock is stuck for too long
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Fri Oct 06 2023 - 16:26:08 EST
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:23PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> Is this related to the qspinlock issue you described earlier?
Kind of in that sometimes qspinlock issues trigger CSD-lock warnings,
but not really directly related.
Thanx, Paul
> jonas
>
>
> Am 10/5/2023 um 6:48 PM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> > The CSD lock seems to get stuck in 2 "modes". When it gets stuck
> > temporarily, it usually gets released in a few seconds, and sometimes
> > up to one or two minutes.
> >
> > If the CSD lock stays stuck for more than several minutes, it never
> > seems to get unstuck, and gradually more and more things in the system
> > end up also getting stuck.
> >
> > In the latter case, we should just give up, so the system can dump out
> > a little more information about what went wrong, and, with panic_on_oops
> > and a kdump kernel loaded, dump a whole bunch more information about
> > what might have gone wrong.
> >
> > Question: should this have its own panic_on_ipistall switch in
> > /proc/sys/kernel, or maybe piggyback on panic_on_oops in a different
> > way than via BUG_ON?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > index 8455a53465af..059f1f53fc6b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(struct __call_single_data *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *
> > }
> > ts2 = sched_clock();
> > + /* How long since we last checked for a stuck CSD lock.*/
> > ts_delta = ts2 - *ts1;
> > if (likely(ts_delta <= csd_lock_timeout_ns || csd_lock_timeout_ns == 0))
> > return false;
> > @@ -243,9 +244,17 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(struct __call_single_data *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *
> > else
> > cpux = cpu;
> > cpu_cur_csd = smp_load_acquire(&per_cpu(cur_csd, cpux)); /* Before func and info. */
> > + /* How long since this CSD lock was stuck. */
> > + ts_delta = ts2 - ts0;
> > pr_alert("csd: %s non-responsive CSD lock (#%d) on CPU#%d, waiting %llu ns for CPU#%02d %pS(%ps).\n",
> > - firsttime ? "Detected" : "Continued", *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), ts2 - ts0,
> > + firsttime ? "Detected" : "Continued", *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), ts_delta,
> > cpu, csd->func, csd->info);
> > + /*
> > + * If the CSD lock is still stuck after 5 minutes, it is unlikely
> > + * to become unstuck. Use a signed comparison to avoid triggering
> > + * on underflows when the TSC is out of sync between sockets.
> > + */
> > + BUG_ON((s64)ts_delta > 300000000000LL);
> > if (cpu_cur_csd && csd != cpu_cur_csd) {
> > pr_alert("\tcsd: CSD lock (#%d) handling prior %pS(%ps) request.\n",
> > *bug_id, READ_ONCE(per_cpu(cur_csd_func, cpux)),
>