Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490: Add qcm6490 dts file

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 3.10.2023 19:54, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> Add qcm6490 devicetree file for QCM6490 SoC and QCM6490 IDP
> platform. QCM6490 is derived from SC7280 meant for various
> form factor including IoT.
> 
> Supported features are, as of now:
> * Debug UART
> * eMMC
> * USB
> 
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile        |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490.dtsi    |  94 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 428 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> index 73c3be0f8872..3a2d9dbaacce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= msm8998-sony-xperia-yoshino-maple.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= msm8998-sony-xperia-yoshino-poplar.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= msm8998-xiaomi-sagit.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= qcm6490-fairphone-fp5.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= qcm6490-idp.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= qcs404-evb-1000.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= qcs404-evb-4000.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= qdu1000-idp.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d81a7810fd5a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmk8350.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
> +#include "pm7325.dtsi"
> +#include "pm8350c.dtsi"
> +#include "pmk8350.dtsi"
> +#include "qcm6490.dtsi"
As the kernel robot pointed out, this has clearly not even been
compile-tested..

Konrad