Re: [RFC PATCH] ssb: relax SSB_EMBEDDED dependencies

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sun Oct 08 2023 - 10:08:51 EST




On 10/8/23 00:35, Michael Büsch wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> thanks for the patch.
>
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 11:24:43 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This is a kconfig warning in a randconfig when CONFIG_PCI is not set:
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SSB_EMBEDDED
>> Depends on [n]: SSB [=y] && SSB_DRIVER_MIPS [=y] &&
>> SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE [=n] Selected by [y]:
>> - BCM47XX_SSB [=y] && BCM47XX [=y]
>>
>> This is caused by arch/mips/bcm47xx/Kconfig's symbol BCM47XX_SSB
>> selecting SSB_EMBEDDED when CONFIG_PCI is not set.
>>
>> This warning can be prevented by having SSB_EMBEDDED not depend on
>> SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE, although some parts of SSB use PCI.
>
>> diff -- a/drivers/ssb/Kconfig b/drivers/ssb/Kconfig
>> --- a/drivers/ssb/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/ssb/Kconfig
>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ config SSB_SFLASH
>> # Assumption: We are on embedded, if we compile the MIPS core.
>> config SSB_EMBEDDED
>> bool
>> - depends on SSB_DRIVER_MIPS && SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE
>> + depends on SSB_DRIVER_MIPS
>> default y
>>
>> config SSB_DRIVER_EXTIF
>
> Could we instead make SSB_EMBEDDED depend on SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE if
> PCI!=n. Wouldn't that also solve the problem?
>
> I don't fully remember how all this ssb config stuff works, but to
> me adding a PCICORE->PCI dependency sounds safer against build
> regressions in some other configurations.
>
> What do you think?

I'll test it some and see how it works out.
Thanks.

--
~Randy